Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRVG · against 508 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #169 of 509 · scores higher than 67% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including TRVG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRVG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | 0.17× | 0.40× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 0.57 | 0.61 | 54% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 498 reported | 1.65× | 1.37× | 58% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 3 | 1.08T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.62T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 5 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 165 | 1.1B HKD (≈$135M) | 68 | 42 | |
| 166 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.6B CNY (≈$510M) |
| 68 |
| 39 |
| 167 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 67 | 19 |
| 168 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 67 | 74 |
| 169 | 248M USD | 67 | 58 |
| 170 | 509.1B CLP (≈$560M) | 67 | 48 |
| 171 | 17.6B USD | 67 | 64 |
| 172 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 66 | 55 |
| 173 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 66 | 73 |