Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vipshop Holdings Limited
How Vipshop Holdings Limited stacks up
VIPS · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
32/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #272 of 356 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score32 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including VIPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: -2.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.9% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VIPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | -2.3% | 5.9% | 15% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -1.4% | 6.2% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 0.9% | 4.1% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VIPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 269 | 4.6B USD | 33 | 39 | |
| 272 | 3.6B USD | 32 | 59 | |
| 272 | 10.9B USD | 32 | 47 | |
| 272 | 4.9B USD | 32 | 51 | |
| 272 | 6.2B USD | 32 | 69 | |
| 276 | 1.3B USD | 31 | 44 | |
| 276 | 16.8B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 278 | 7.7B USD | 30 | 42 | |
| 278 | 57.2B USD | 30 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score