Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to United Rentals, Inc.
How United Rentals, Inc. stacks up
URI · against 76 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #35 of 77 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including URI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = URI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | URI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 77 reported | 6.9% | 7.0% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 71 reported | 7.5% | 7.3% | 51% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 8.5% | 6.5% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around URI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 32 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 60 | 62 | |
| 32 | 79.3B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 32 | 91.8B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 35 | 6.21T JPY (≈$42.2B) | 59 | 53 | |
| 35 | 73.1B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 35 | 93.8B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 38 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.6B) | 55 | 50 | |
| 39 | 3.32T INR (≈$39.8B) | 54 | 53 | |
| 40 | 78.2B USD | 53 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score