Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UPWK · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #98 of 471 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including UPWK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
| Metric | UPWK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 7.9% | 3.0% | 79% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 14.8% | 8.7% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 14.2% | 7.6% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 45.5% | 48.9% | 47% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 98 | 261M MYR (≈$57M) | 79 | 37 | |
| 98 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 619M USD |
| 79 |
| 49 |
| 98 | 387.7B ZAR (≈$21.3B) | 79 | 68 |
| 98 | 1.1B USD | 79 | 40 |
| 98 | 1.2B USD | 79 | 56 |
| 103 | 1.24T KRW (≈$892M) | 78 | 87 |
| 103 | 2.8B HKD (≈$353M) | 78 | 83 |
| 103 | 6.4B JPY (≈$43M) | 78 | 73 |
| 103 | 43.7B SAR (≈$11.8B) | 78 | 71 |