Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.
How Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. stacks up
TV · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #98 of 471 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including TV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.1% vs peer median 2.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.1% vs peer median 7.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 91% of peers. EBITDA yield: 33.0% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | Not reported | 3.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 33.0% | 8.7% | 91% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 27.2% | 7.6% | 90% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 450.0% | 48.9% | 98% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 93 | 39.1B EUR (≈$43.0B) | 80 | 44 | |
| 98 | 261M MYR (≈$57M) | 79 | 37 | |
| 98 | 619M USD | 79 | 49 | |
| 98 | 387.7B ZAR (≈$21.3B) | 79 | 68 | |
| 98 | 1.1B USD | 79 | 40 | |
| 98 | 1.2B USD | 79 | 56 | |
| 103 | 1.24T KRW (≈$892M) | 78 | 87 | |
| 103 | 2.8B HKD (≈$353M) | 78 | 83 | |
| 103 | 6.4B JPY (≈$43M) | 78 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score