Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ulta Beauty, Inc.
How Ulta Beauty, Inc. stacks up
ULTA · against 97 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
64/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #53 of 98 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including ULTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ULTA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ULTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 11.2% | 8.7% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 86 reported | 5.6% | 10.8% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 6.5% | 9.5% | 38% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ULTA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 48 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 48 | 14.5B USD | 68 | 29 | |
| 51 | 24.9B USD | 66 | 49 | |
| 52 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 65 | 76 | |
| 53 | 27.1B USD | 64 | 58 | |
| 54 | 35.5B CAD (≈$25.9B) | 63 | 51 | |
| 54 | 16.2B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 56 | 2.26T JPY (≈$15.4B) | 62 | 69 | |
| 56 | 114.3B HKD (≈$14.6B) | 62 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score