Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ultrapar Participações S.A.
How Ultrapar Participações S.A. stacks up
UGP · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #238 of 386 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including UGP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -47.4% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.3% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UGP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UGP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 6.6% | 0.5% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -47.4% | 1.0% | 18% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -0.3% | -1.3% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UGP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 234 | 135.8B USD | 39 | 60 | |
| 238 | 3.73T JPY (≈$25.4B) | 38 | 63 | |
| 238 | 15.9B CAD (≈$11.6B) | 38 | 26 | |
| 238 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.0B) | 38 | 42 | |
| 238 | 6.0B USD | 38 | 62 | |
| 242 | 3.4B USD | 37 | 62 | |
| 242 | 363M USD | 37 | 37 | |
| 242 | 1.5B USD | 37 | 12 | |
| 242 | 135.1B THB (≈$3.8B) | 37 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score