Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ultrapar Participações S.A.
How Ultrapar Participações S.A. stacks up
UGP · against 187 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Growth
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #135 of 188 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including UGP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -47.4% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.3% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UGP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UGP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 6.6% | 7.9% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | -47.4% | 2.9% | 16% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | -0.3% | 1.0% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UGP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 130 | 3.9B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 130 | 28.4B USD | 41 | 48 | |
| 133 | 651M USD | 40 | 39 | |
| 134 | 135.8B USD | 39 | 60 | |
| 135 | 6.0B USD | 38 | 62 | |
| 136 | 3.4B USD | 37 | 62 | |
| 136 | 363M USD | 37 | 37 | |
| 136 | 1.5B USD | 37 | 12 | |
| 139 | 7.0B USD | 36 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score