Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to UDR, Inc.
How UDR, Inc. stacks up
UDR · against 79 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #22 of 80 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including UDR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UDR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UDR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | 4.4% | 4.1% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 77 reported | 5.6% | 5.4% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 49 reported | 4.8% | 5.4% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 81 reported | 25.1% | 55.7% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UDR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 3 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 4 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 5 | 13.7B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 18 | 10.8B AUD (≈$7.2B) | 67 | 65 | |
| 19 | 7.4B USD | 66 | 46 | |
| 19 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 66 | 48 | |
| 21 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.6B) | 65 | 58 | |
| 22 | 13.2B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 22 | 11.7B AUD (≈$7.8B) | 64 | 58 | |
| 24 | 7.9B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 25 | 14.7B USD | 59 | 61 | |
| 26 | 9.0B USD | 58 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score