Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Uber Technologies, Inc.
How Uber Technologies, Inc. stacks up
UBER · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #410 of 1,667 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including UBER · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.4% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 87% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.0% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UBER, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UBER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 6.8% | 2.3% | 87% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 5.1% | 4.3% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 7.4% | 2.7% | 80% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 20.1% | 33.4% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UBER| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 410 | 1.0B CAD (≈$736M) | 75 | 63 | |
| 410 | 293.4B SEK (≈$29.3B) | 75 | 52 | |
| 410 | 499M SGD (≈$380M) | 75 | 65 | |
| 410 | 62.6B INR (≈$752M) | 75 | 75 | |
| 410 | 136.0B USD | 75 | 60 | |
| 426 | 9.4B TWD (≈$293M) | 74 | 47 | |
| 426 | 409.7B KRW (≈$295M) | 74 | 40 | |
| 426 | 9.7B TWD (≈$301M) | 74 | 48 | |
| 426 | 660.3B TWD (≈$20.5B) | 74 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score