Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UBER · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,329 of 1,698 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including UBER · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UBER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.52× | 0.26× | 32% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.16 | 0.84 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.84× | 1.83× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,325 | 16.9B USD | 22 | 57 | |
| 1,326 | 84.1B THB (≈$2.4B) | 22 | 31 | |
| 1,327 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 22 | 61 | |
| 1,328 | 15.0B USD | 22 | 50 | |
| 1,329 | 136.0B USD | 22 | 60 | |
| 1,330 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 22 | 75 | |
| 1,331 | 139.7B CNY (≈$19.6B) | 22 | 59 | |
| 1,332 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 22 | 29 | |
| 1,333 | 15.8B SEK (≈$1.6B) | 22 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score