Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UBER · against 44 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #30 of 45 · scores higher than 34% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including UBER · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UBER | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 41 reported | 0.52× | 0.40× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 44 reported | 1.16 | 1.25 | 65% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 45 reported | 0.84× | 1.51× | 9% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 3 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 80 | 74 | |
| 4 | 185.0B USD | 78 | 66 | |
| 5 | 164.9B USD | 78 | 89 | |
| 26 | 5.87T TWD (≈$182.0B) | 25 | 46 | |
| 27 | 203.8B USD | 25 | 56 | |
| 28 | 181.7B EUR (≈$199.8B) | 23 | 56 | |
| 29 | 112.9B USD | 22 | 49 | |
| 30 | 136.0B USD | 22 | 60 | |
| 31 | 832.5B CNY (≈$116.5B) | 21 | 65 | |
| 32 | 117.3B USD | 21 | 56 | |
| 33 | 125.2B USD | 21 | 70 | |
| 34 | 95.8B USD | 21 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score