Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
How Texas Roadhouse, Inc. stacks up
TXRH · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #139 of 356 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including TXRH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -4.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.7% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TXRH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TXRH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 9.9% | 5.9% | 66% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -4.3% | 6.2% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 12.7% | 4.1% | 79% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TXRH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 135 | 2.8B USD | 68 | 55 | |
| 135 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 135 | 14.5B USD | 68 | 29 | |
| 139 | 2.0B USD | 67 | 64 | |
| 139 | 12.1B USD | 67 | 57 | |
| 139 | 770M USD | 67 | 48 | |
| 142 | 24.9B USD | 66 | 49 | |
| 142 | 72.8B USD | 66 | 62 | |
| 144 | 326M USD | 65 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score