Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TWIN · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #617 of 2,437 · scores higher than 75% of peers · safety percentile 75
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)243 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TWIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TWIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.23× | 0.41× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.67 | 0.61 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 2.35× | 1.62× | 73% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 613 | 7.8B TWD (≈$243M) | 75 | 53 | |
| 614 | 4.6B USD | 75 | 58 | |
| 615 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 75 | 77 | |
| 616 | 3.3B CNY (≈$461M) | 75 | 26 | |
| 617 | 364M USD | 75 | 71 | |
| 618 | 5.0B CNY (≈$703M) | 75 | 38 | |
| 619 | 6.4B CNY (≈$893M) | 75 | 32 | |
| 620 | 2.0B CNY (≈$286M) | 75 | 41 | |
| 621 | 200.4B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 75 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score