Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Twin Disc, Incorporated
How Twin Disc, Incorporated stacks up
TWIN · against 2,439 other Industrials companies
Profitability
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #989 of 2,440 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score244 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including TWIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger return on assets, but weaker operating margin than most Industrials peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 68% of peers. Operating margin: 4.7% vs peer median 7.7%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 5.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on assets: 8.6% vs peer median 3.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TWIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TWIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2,323 reported | 5.7% | 7.1% | 42% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 2,434 reported | 4.7% | 7.7% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 2,336 reported | 8.6% | 3.1% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2,300 reported | 13.2% | 8.0% | 72% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 2,460 reported | 26.9% | 25.8% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TWINScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score