Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TETRA Technologies, Inc.
How TETRA Technologies, Inc. stacks up
TTI · against 102 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
18/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 103 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including TTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 83% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.7% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.7% vs peer median 6.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.2% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 102 reported | 0.7% | 4.7% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 9.2% | 12.1% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | -1.7% | 4.9% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 101 reported | 46.3% | 72.8% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 73 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 22 | 36 | |
| 73 | 1.1B USD | 22 | 26 | |
| 75 | 135.3B INR (≈$1.6B) | 20 | 47 | |
| 76 | 883M USD | 18 | 42 | |
| 76 | 881M USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 78 | 596M USD | 17 | 34 | |
| 79 | 590M USD | 16 | 21 | |
| 79 | 1.6B USD | 16 | 30 | |
| 79 | 455M EUR (≈$500M) | 16 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score