Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Trane Technologies plc
How Trane Technologies plc stacks up
TT · against 65 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #33 of 66 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including TT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 66 reported | 7.0% | 7.8% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 62 reported | 4.4% | 8.3% | 36% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 65 reported | 9.7% | 6.6% | 69% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 30 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 62 | 51 | |
| 30 | 60.7B GBP (≈$78.9B) | 62 | 48 | |
| 32 | 49.7B USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 33 | 79.3B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 33 | 91.8B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 35 | 73.1B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 35 | 93.8B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 37 | 22.15T JPY (≈$150.6B) | 55 | 60 | |
| 38 | 78.2B USD | 53 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score