Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TSCO · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #849 of 1,585 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including TSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 2.49× | 0.50× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.47 | 0.56 | 59% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.33× | 1.48× | 43% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 845 | 2.0B BRL (≈$353M) | 47 | 73 | |
| 846 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 386M EUR (≈$424M) |
| 47 |
| 33 |
| 847 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 47 | 58 |
| 848 | 93.7B INR (≈$1.1B) | 47 | 61 |
| 849 | 18.3B USD | 46 | 55 |
| 850 | 13.0B USD | 46 | 68 |
| 851 | 3.4B HKD (≈$432M) | 46 | 46 |
| 852 | 4.8B CNY (≈$667M) | 46 | 55 |
| 853 | 1.8B CAD (≈$1.3B) | 46 | 56 |