Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tractor Supply Company
How Tractor Supply Company stacks up
TSCO · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #913 of 1,586 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TSCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 4.0% | 3.7% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -5.3% | 4.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 2.2% | 4.3% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TSCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 913 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 42 | 49 | |
| 913 | 1.0B BRL (≈$186M) | 42 | 32 | |
| 913 | 615.5B CLP (≈$677M) | 42 | 37 | |
| 913 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 42 | 45 | |
| 913 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 913 | 1.4B AUD (≈$896M) | 42 | 51 | |
| 913 | 1.8B USD | 42 | 46 | |
| 929 | 6.1B CNY (≈$852M) | 41 | 52 | |
| 929 | 35.2B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 41 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score