Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tractor Supply Company
How Tractor Supply Company stacks up
TSCO · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #238 of 356 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TSCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 4.0% | 5.9% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -5.3% | 6.2% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 2.2% | 4.1% | 39% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TSCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 233 | 11.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 233 | 10.2B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 237 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 238 | 332.9B USD | 42 | 45 | |
| 238 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 238 | 1.8B USD | 42 | 46 | |
| 241 | 249.7B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 241 | 2.4B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 241 | 4.6B USD | 41 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score