Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Alibaba Group Holding Limited
How Alibaba Group Holding Limited stacks up
BABA · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #929 of 1,586 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including BABA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -17.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.6% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BABA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BABA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 2.7% | 3.7% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -17.9% | 4.1% | 27% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 5.6% | 4.3% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BABA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 929 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 41 | 73 | |
| 929 | 53.4B JPY (≈$363M) | 41 | 54 | |
| 929 | 146.0B JPY (≈$993M) | 41 | 59 | |
| 929 | 249M AUD (≈$164M) | 41 | 35 | |
| 929 | 249.7B USD | 41 | 46 | |
| 929 | 2.4B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 929 | 4.6B USD | 41 | 44 | |
| 929 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 41 | 53 | |
| 929 | 1.1B GBP (≈$1.4B) | 41 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score