Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRTX · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #560 of 751 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including TRTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 3.36× | 0.82× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.47 | 0.69 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 112.97× | 1.20× | 100% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 556 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.1B) | 26 | 57 | |
| 557 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 181M EUR (≈$199M) |
| 26 |
| 46 |
| 558 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 26 | 46 |
| 559 | 26.1B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 26 | 14 |
| 560 | 523M USD | 25 | 28 |
| 561 | 3.5B CNY (≈$484M) | 25 | 19 |
| 562 | 71.4B JPY (≈$486M) | 25 | 73 |
| 563 | 6.2B CNY (≈$864M) | 25 | 21 |
| 564 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 25 | 62 |