Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
How T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. stacks up
TROW · against 46 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #34 of 47 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TROW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.2% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TROW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TROW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 48 reported | 7.0% | 11.3% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 42 reported | 12.2% | 17.0% | 39% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 45 reported | 6.6% | 9.3% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TROW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 2 | 226.5B SEK (≈$22.7B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 3 | 24.3B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 4 | 18.9B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1.49T INR (≈$17.9B) | 93 | 71 | |
| 31 | 11.7B USD | 46 | 33 | |
| 31 | 12.7B USD | 46 | 63 | |
| 33 | 9.2B GBP (≈$11.9B) | 45 | 58 | |
| 34 | 24.5B USD | 42 | 47 | |
| 34 | 22.7B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 36 | 11.8B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 37 | 18.7B EUR (≈$20.6B) | 37 | 52 | |
| 38 | 14.1B USD | 36 | 57 | |
| 38 | 15.3B EUR (≈$16.8B) | 36 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score