Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
How T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. stacks up
TROW · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #212 of 367 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TROW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.2% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TROW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TROW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 7.0% | 7.4% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 12.2% | 9.9% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 6.6% | 10.0% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TROW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 208 | 641M USD | 43 | 74 | |
| 212 | 9.2B HKD (≈$1.2B) | 42 | 39 | |
| 212 | 749.2B INR (≈$9.0B) | 42 | ||
| 212 | 24.5B USD | 42 | 47 | |
| 212 | 22.7B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 216 | 22.8B SEK (≈$2.3B) | 41 | 51 | |
| 216 | 294M CAD (≈$215M) | 41 | 49 | |
| 216 | 588M USD | 41 | ||
| 219 | 44.7B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score