Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FactSet Research Systems Inc.
How FactSet Research Systems Inc. stacks up
FDS · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #219 of 367 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including FDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.9% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FDS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 6.6% | 7.4% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 12.9% | 9.9% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 6.0% | 10.0% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FDS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 216 | 294M CAD (≈$215M) | 41 | 49 | |
| 216 | 588M USD | 41 | ||
| 219 | 44.7B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 29 | |
| 219 | 13.1B AUD (≈$8.6B) | 40 | 55 | |
| 219 | 11.8B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 219 | 82.3B THB (≈$2.3B) | 40 | 60 | |
| 223 | 221M CAD (≈$161M) | 39 | ||
| 223 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 39 | 67 | |
| 223 | 353M USD | 39 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score