Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
How T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. stacks up
TROW · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #106 of 154 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TROW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.6% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.2% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TROW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TROW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 7.0% | 10.5% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 12.2% | 11.4% | 52% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 6.6% | 11.5% | 30% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TROW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 102 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 52 | |
| 104 | 276M USD | 43 | 40 | |
| 104 | 641M USD | 43 | 74 | |
| 106 | 24.5B USD | 42 | 47 | |
| 106 | 22.7B USD | 42 | 64 | |
| 108 | 588M USD | 41 | ||
| 109 | 11.8B USD | 40 | 51 | |
| 110 | 353M USD | 39 | 59 | |
| 110 | 97.2B USD | 39 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score