Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRNO · against 123 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #58 of 124 · scores higher than 54% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including TRNO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta and current ratio than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRNO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 124 reported | 0.21× | 0.84× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 121 reported | 1.04 | 0.85 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 120 reported | 0.62× | 0.83× | 40% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 4 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 90 | 78 | |
| 5 | 11.7B USD | 89 | 80 | |
| 54 | 11.7B AUD (≈$7.8B) | 46 | 58 | |
| 55 | 6.1B SGD (≈$4.7B) | 46 | 44 | |
| 56 | 3.58T CLP (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 66 | |
| 57 | 14.1B USD | 45 | 69 | |
| 58 | 7.3B USD | 44 | 58 | |
| 59 | 290.6B THB (≈$8.1B) | 44 | 67 | |
| 60 | 13.9B USD | 43 | 43 | |
| 61 | 3.8B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 62 | 6.3B AUD (≈$4.2B) | 42 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score