Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Trinity Capital Inc.
How Trinity Capital Inc. stacks up
TRIN · against 73 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #43 of 74 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including TRIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -38.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.8% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 113 reported | 10.2% | 8.3% | 63% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | Not reported | 6.9% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | -38.8% | 8.4% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 103 reported | 77.8% | 93.6% | 42% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 66 | |
| 3 | 22.8B SEK (≈$2.3B) | 95 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 93 | 47 | |
| 40 | 1.5B USD | 53 | 74 | |
| 41 | 994M USD | 52 | 51 | |
| 42 | 772M USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 43 | 3.0B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 43 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 45 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 29 | |
| 45 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 47 | 1.7B USD | 48 | ||
| 48 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 46 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score