Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to World Acceptance Corporation
How World Acceptance Corporation stacks up
WRLD · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #131 of 269 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including WRLD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.1% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.1% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WRLD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WRLD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 4.8% | 5.6% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 8.1% | 6.8% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 33.7% | 6.1% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 48.4% | 83.1% | 34% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WRLD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 129 | 9.6B USD | 52 | 73 | |
| 129 | 994M USD | 52 | 51 | |
| 131 | 6.4B SEK (≈$637M) | 51 | 30 | |
| 131 | 46.6B USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 131 | 772M USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 134 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 50 | 67 | |
| 134 | 3.0B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 134 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 137 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score