Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Central Securities Corporation
How Central Securities Corporation stacks up
CET · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #140 of 269 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Financial Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.3% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 13.3% | 5.6% | 84% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 2.2% | 6.8% | 20% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 110.7% | 83.1% | 66% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CET| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 134 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 137 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 29 | |
| 137 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 137 | 6.5B AUD (≈$4.3B) | 49 | 61 | |
| 140 | 1.7B USD | 48 | ||
| 140 | 5.3B USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 142 | 3.4B NOK (≈$320M) | 47 | 48 | |
| 142 | 67.1B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 142 | 3.4B EUR (≈$3.7B) | 47 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score