Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Apollo Global Management, Inc.
How Apollo Global Management, Inc. stacks up
APO · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #142 of 269 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including APO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 2.5% | 5.6% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 14.1% | 6.1% | 73% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 30.0% | 83.1% | 22% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 137 | 6.5B AUD (≈$4.3B) | 49 | 61 | |
| 140 | 1.7B USD | 48 | ||
| 140 | 5.3B USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 142 | 3.4B NOK (≈$320M) | 47 | 48 | |
| 142 | 67.1B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 142 | 3.4B EUR (≈$3.7B) | 47 | 39 | |
| 145 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 46 | 48 | |
| 145 | 8.9B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 145 | 15.1B USD | 46 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score