Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Thomson Reuters Corporation
How Thomson Reuters Corporation stacks up
TRI · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
31/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,645 of 2,400 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including TRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -31.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 3.0% | 4.4% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | -31.9% | 7.1% | 17% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 4.1% | 4.2% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRIScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score