Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Thomson Reuters Corporation
How Thomson Reuters Corporation stacks up
TRI · against 115 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #98 of 116 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including TRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -31.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 116 reported | 3.0% | 6.6% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 106 reported | -31.9% | 7.2% | 10% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 115 reported | 4.1% | 6.3% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 95 | 3.51T INR (≈$42.1B) | 34 | 30 | |
| 96 | 11.30T JPY (≈$76.8B) | 33 | 51 | |
| 96 | 7.82T JPY (≈$53.2B) | 33 | 40 | |
| 98 | 32.3B CHF (≈$37.2B) | 31 | 53 | |
| 98 | 47.7B USD | 31 | 55 | |
| 98 | 24.5B EUR (≈$26.9B) | 31 | 37 | |
| 101 | 37.0B USD | 30 | 54 | |
| 102 | 76.6B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 102 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.8B) | 29 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score