Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Thomson Reuters Corporation
How Thomson Reuters Corporation stacks up
TRI · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
31/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #355 of 446 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including TRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 83% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -31.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 3.0% | 8.4% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -31.9% | 9.2% | 16% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 4.1% | 5.2% | 42% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 347 | 4.6B USD | 33 | 50 | |
| 352 | 15.6B USD | 32 | 46 | |
| 352 | 5.9B USD | 32 | 62 | |
| 352 | 11.1B USD | 32 | 54 | |
| 355 | 47.7B USD | 31 | 55 | |
| 356 | 3.2B USD | 30 | 60 | |
| 356 | 37.0B USD | 30 | 54 | |
| 358 | 179.5B USD | 29 | 35 | |
| 358 | 525M USD | 29 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score