Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tapestry, Inc.
How Tapestry, Inc. stacks up
TPR · against 105 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #38 of 106 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including TPR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.2% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TPR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TPR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 104 reported | 6.0% | 4.6% | 69% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 7.5% | 7.4% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 61 reported | 7.5% | 4.5% | 72% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 100 reported | 2.9% | 21.8% | 5% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TPR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 35 | 16.2B USD | 57 | 62 | |
| 36 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 54 | 53 | |
| 36 | 526.8B ZAR (≈$29.0B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 38 | 21.7B USD | 53 | 58 | |
| 38 | 24.1B USD | 53 | 63 | |
| 40 | 3.33T JPY (≈$22.7B) | 51 | 47 | |
| 40 | 15.4B USD | 51 | 74 | |
| 40 | 13.9B USD | 51 | 44 | |
| 43 | 16.7B USD | 50 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score