Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TOL · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #253 of 1,585 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including TOL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TOL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.34× | 0.50× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.33 | 0.56 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 4.50× | 1.48× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 249 | 213M MYR (≈$47M) | 84 | 45 | |
| 250 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.6B CNY (≈$367M) |
| 84 |
| 66 |
| 251 | 3.3B USD | 84 | 61 |
| 252 | 86.0B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 84 | 71 |
| 253 | 13.8B USD | 84 | 66 |
| 254 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 84 | 73 |
| 255 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 84 | 70 |
| 256 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 84 | 53 |
| 257 | 4.5B CNY (≈$632M) | 84 | 70 |