Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TJX · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #79 of 362 · scores higher than 78% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)22 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TJX · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TJX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 319 reported | 1.34× | 0.99× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 348 reported | 0.56 | 1.14 | 88% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported | 1.15× | 1.47× | 34% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 89 | |
| 2 | 499M USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 141M USD | 95 | 30 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 95 | 89 | |
| 5 | 283M USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 75 | 892M USD | 57 | 53 | |
| 76 | 6.2B USD | 57 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 77 | 511M USD | 56 | 50 |
| 78 | 914M USD | 56 | 44 |
| 79 | 151.4B USD | 56 | 61 |
| 80 | 5.2B USD | 55 | 50 |
| 81 | 5.7B USD | 55 | 77 |
| 82 | 3.7B USD | 54 | 66 |
| 83 | 1.4B USD | 53 | 62 |