Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TJX · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #700 of 1,585 · scores higher than 56% of peers · safety percentile 56
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TJX · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TJX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.34× | 0.50× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.56 | 0.56 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.15× | 1.48× | 33% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 696 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 56 | 66 | |
| 697 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) |
| 56 |
| 77 |
| 698 | 914M USD | 56 | 44 |
| 699 | 6.1B CNY (≈$854M) | 56 | 35 |
| 700 | 151.4B USD | 56 | 61 |
| 701 | 2.0B CNY (≈$284M) | 56 | 64 |
| 702 | 116.8B JPY (≈$794M) | 56 | 58 |
| 703 | 128.2B KRW (≈$92M) | 56 | 34 |
| 704 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 56 | 86 |