Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RUSHA · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #711 of 1,585 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 55
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including RUSHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RUSHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 0.63× | 0.50× | 43% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.88 | 0.56 | 30% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.45× | 1.48× | 49% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 707 | 2.9B HKD (≈$366M) | 55 | 40 | |
| 708 | 7.5B EUR (≈$8.2B) | 55 | 40 | |
| 709 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 55 | 69 | |
| 710 | 1.5B CNY (≈$215M) | 55 | 32 | |
| 711 | 5.2B USD | 55 | 50 | |
| 712 | 4.2B CNY (≈$584M) | 55 | 41 | |
| 713 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 55 | 73 | |
| 714 | 5.7B USD | 55 | 77 | |
| 715 | 26.9B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 55 | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score