Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TECH · against 156 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #61 of 157 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TECH · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TECH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 153 reported | 0.14× | 0.34× | 68% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 160 reported | 1.27 | 0.59 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 148 reported | 4.55× | 2.22× | 78% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 2 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 4 | 10.2B USD | 97 | ||
| 5 | 9.8B USD | 96 | ||
| 57 | 1.17T JPY (≈$8.0B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 58 | 311.5B THB (≈$8.7B) | 53 | 62 | |
| 59 | 558.5B INR (≈$6.7B) | 53 | 47 | |
| 60 | 47.7B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 53 | 64 | |
| 61 | 11.4B USD | 52 | 64 | |
| 62 | 10.4B USD | 52 | 70 | |
| 63 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 52 | 45 | |
| 64 | 10.6B USD | 51 | 64 | |
| 65 | 27.5B NZD (≈$16.5B) | 50 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score