Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRNX · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #25 of 1,373 · scores higher than 98% of peers · safety percentile 98
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CRNX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRNX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.04× | 0.24× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.09 | 0.53 | 87% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 15.57× | 2.62× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 21 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 100 | |
| 22 | 831M USD | 98 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 23 | 15.6B TWD (≈$485M) | 98 | 49 |
| 24 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 |
| 25 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 |
| 26 | 1.3B USD | 98 | 39 |
| 27 | 927M USD | 98 | 41 |
| 28 | 14.9B TWD (≈$462M) | 98 | 42 |
| 29 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 |