Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NUVL · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #54 of 1,373 · scores higher than 96% of peers · safety percentile 96
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including NUVL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NUVL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | Not reported | 0.24× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.14 | 0.53 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 16.14× | 2.62× | 94% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 50 | 4.7B HKD (≈$606M) | 96 | 75 | |
| 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 238M USD |
| 96 |
| 41 |
| 52 | 71.0B JPY (≈$483M) | 96 |
| 53 | 40.1B JPY (≈$273M) | 96 | 45 |
| 54 | 9.8B USD | 96 |
| 55 | 2.6B AUD (≈$1.7B) | 96 | 62 |
| 56 | 3.7B USD | 96 | 28 |
| 57 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 96 | 48 |
| 58 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 39 |