Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
How Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. stacks up
TCI · against 231 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #98 of 232 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TCI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 20.2% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TCI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TCI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 235 reported | 5.3% | 1.6% | 61% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 127 reported | 20.2% | 7.9% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 231 reported | 3.6% | 2.4% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TCI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 2 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 71.4B JPY (≈$486M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2.4B BRL (≈$428M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 94 | 2.5B BRL (≈$449M) | 57 | 70 | |
| 94 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 57 | 85 | |
| 96 | 610M EUR (≈$671M) | 56 | 67 | |
| 96 | 578M CHF (≈$664M) | 56 | 55 | |
| 98 | 435M USD | 55 | 43 | |
| 98 | 2.9B SEK (≈$289M) | 55 | 48 | |
| 100 | 84.7B JPY (≈$576M) | 54 | 50 | |
| 100 | 5.0B SEK (≈$504M) | 54 | 47 | |
| 102 | 957M AUD (≈$632M) | 53 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score