Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TAL · against 128 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #24 of 129 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 79
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)23 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 129 reported | 0.10× | 0.40× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 127 reported | 0.14 | 0.36 | 75% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 122 reported | 1.69× | 1.59× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 4 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.6B MYR (≈$2.8B) | 94 | 40 | |
| 21 | 7.2B USD | 80 | 72 | |
| 22 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 79 | 67 | |
| 23 | 629.6B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 79 | 56 | |
| 24 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 79 | 76 | |
| 24 | 5.5B USD | 79 | 84 | |
| 26 | 3.3B USD | 78 | 71 | |
| 27 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.8B) | 77 | 58 | |
| 28 | 613.1B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 77 | 71 | |
| 29 | 1.16T JPY (≈$7.9B) | 76 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score