Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TAL · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #171 of 802 · scores higher than 79% of peers · safety percentile 79
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and beta, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.10× | 0.44× | 77% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.14 | 0.32 | 74% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.69× | 1.53× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 168 | 1.3B USD | 79 | 40 | |
| 169 | 275M USD | 79 | 27 | |
| 170 | 629.6B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 79 | 56 | |
| 171 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 79 | 76 | |
| 171 | 5.5B USD | 79 | 84 | |
| 173 | 50.3B INR (≈$604M) | 79 | 77 | |
| 174 | 3.3B USD | 78 | 71 | |
| 175 | 4.3B CNY (≈$605M) | 78 | 76 | |
| 176 | 11.7B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 78 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score