Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Stryker Corporation
How Stryker Corporation stacks up
SYK · against 27 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #12 of 28 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including SYK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 27.4% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SYK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SYK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 28 reported | 8.5% | 6.9% | 74% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 26 reported | 27.4% | 23.2% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 28 reported | 9.9% | 5.1% | 81% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SYK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 126.5B USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 2 | 534.1B HKD (≈$68.4B) | 76 | 75 | |
| 3 | 63.0B USD | 73 | 65 | |
| 3 | 155.7B USD | 73 | 64 | |
| 5 | 540.4B BRL (≈$97.3B) | 72 | 64 | |
| 8 | 116.5B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 9 | 78.1B USD | 64 | 60 | |
| 10 | 126.1B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 11 | 177.5B USD | 60 | 71 | |
| 12 | 119.1B USD | 58 | 57 | |
| 12 | 134.5B USD | 58 | 70 | |
| 14 | 108.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 15 | 100.2B USD | 54 | 57 | |
| 16 | 116.9B USD | 49 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score