Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Novo Nordisk A/S
How Novo Nordisk A/S stacks up
NVO · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #482 of 1,217 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score122 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including NVO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 1.8% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 20.4% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NVO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NVO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 6.4% | 6.1% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | 1.8% | 9.7% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 20.4% | 5.8% | 81% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NVO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 482 | 15.6B TWD (≈$485M) | 60 | 49 | |
| 482 | 2.67T INR (≈$32.1B) | 60 | 68 | |
| 482 | 353M EUR (≈$388M) | 60 | 77 | |
| 482 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 36 | |
| 482 | 177.5B USD | 60 | 71 | |
| 482 | 588M USD | 60 | 24 | |
| 482 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 61 | |
| 482 | 10.4B USD | 60 | 64 | |
| 482 | 303.5B INR (≈$3.6B) | 60 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score