Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sanofi
How Sanofi stacks up
SNY · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #543 of 1,217 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score122 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including SNY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 75% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 45.6% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SNY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SNY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 5.5% | 6.1% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | 45.6% | 9.7% | 75% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 4.8% | 5.8% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SNY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 543 | 28.7B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 543 | 251M EUR (≈$276M) | 55 | 52 | |
| 543 | 139M USD | 55 | 32 | |
| 543 | 2.2B CAD (≈$1.6B) | 55 | 44 | |
| 543 | 108.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 543 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 543 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 55 | 70 | |
| 555 | 13.3B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 54 | 65 | |
| 555 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 54 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score