Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SVV · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #832 of 1,553 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | SVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 1.6% | 4.4% | 29% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 8.4% | 8.8% | 48% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 5.7% | 6.1% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 31.1% | 57.2% | 28% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 832 | 49.2B INR (≈$590M) | 46 | 71 | |
| 832 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 203M BRL (≈$37M) |
| 46 |
| 33 |
| 832 | 1.1B USD | 46 | 60 |
| 832 | 17.2B GBP (≈$22.4B) | 46 | 60 |
| 832 | 1.4B USD | 46 | 38 |
| 847 | 8.7B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 45 | 46 |
| 847 | 2.0B TWD (≈$63M) | 45 | 34 |
| 847 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 45 | 50 |
| 847 | 570.7B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 55 |