Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SVV · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,387 of 1,585 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 3.23× | 0.50× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.22 | 0.56 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 0.84× | 1.48× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,383 | 9.4B USD | 13 | 55 | |
| 1,384 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.5B CNY (≈$766M) |
| 13 |
| 50 |
| 1,385 | 30.2B TWD (≈$935M) | 13 | 30 |
| 1,386 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 13 | 41 |
| 1,387 | 1.4B USD | 13 | 38 |
| 1,388 | 17.5B USD | 12 | 18 |
| 1,389 | 53.5B CNY (≈$7.5B) | 12 | 45 |
| 1,390 | 2M USD | 12 | 5 |
| 1,391 | 2.3B USD | 12 | 16 |